- #WHY ARE MAC BETTER FOR VIDEO EDITING UPGRADE#
- #WHY ARE MAC BETTER FOR VIDEO EDITING PRO#
- #WHY ARE MAC BETTER FOR VIDEO EDITING PC#
If you feel the need to mock people for what they prefer, then you’re just showing the insecurities of a childish bully. You should also be proud of what you like since that’s a part of who you are. You should use what works for you and what you like. He didn’t even list many real good reasons! Hell, one of his reasons for using PCs was JUST to comform to what others are using.Īnd once again, I reitterate. I like the idea behind his approach, but I thought his implementation was stupid. He wasn’t proud of browsing, he’s proud of what he uses.
In response to you, READ what he was saying. What the hell is so extraordinary that you can browse through the web-pages? This is so typical when mac users want to get proud.
>I am typing this from an iBook with Gentoo Linux installed. I know the ease of use and power of the Mac fully well, and I still choose to use Windows.
#WHY ARE MAC BETTER FOR VIDEO EDITING UPGRADE#
Plus, for $290 right now, I can upgrade my system from a Celeron 566 to an Athlon 1.5 GHz with DDR2700 RAM–certainly, my mother wouldn’t want to perform an upgrade like this, but there are those of us that would, so your general statement just falls flat. I could go on, but you get the idea–there are a wide variety of needs out there, and right now, XP is more mature. Also, I had to print out about 60 pages of PowerPoint slides a day for class this semester, and XP’s simple “print x pages per sheet” feature is fantastic. If you’re not running NetInfo, currently OS X offers nothing comparable to Network Neighborhood if you just want to browse the network. Or how about all those Mac gamers who never got to play Half-Life? Or those who can’t use their joysticks in OS X? How the Mac users who still can’t use Kazaa and other such services?Ī few times this year I’ve unexpectedly needed to fax something, and XP comes with beautiful built-in fax support.
#WHY ARE MAC BETTER FOR VIDEO EDITING PC#
Predator 2” out only six months after the PC version. One of my favorite examples comes from MWSF this year, where Macplay was positively beaming with pride that they expected to get “Alien vs. There are lots of reasons why Macs are a great choice for lots of people.īut there are lots of good reasons why Macs aren’t a good choice for lots of people, too. And typically, Apple’s “we do it all” approach leads to fewer headaches with getting things working together (although a quick trip to Maintouch’s “Issues” page would show that it’s not as perfect as some Mac fans claim, and even Steve’s iPod wouldn’t sync correctly at Macworld). For example, OS X is starting to really shape up (although the people who give the blanket “it’s so much better than XP in every way” are obviously either ignorant of or dishonest about its shortcomings), their hardware is beautifully designed, and their iApps are genuinely useful. I realize this whole discussion is one big flame-bait in the making, but honestly if people actually knew the power and ease of the Mac, they would never go back to Windows.ĭon’t you think that’s a little bit of an over-generalization? I was a Machead for a decade, then moved over to PCs. So if you don’t like one product, you actually have a choice.
Choosing a PC gives you access to a whole lot more products, from a whole lot more vendors. Nothing with the word “Pro” in its name is broadcast quality! That’s just marketing hooey.
#WHY ARE MAC BETTER FOR VIDEO EDITING PRO#
I sure wouldn’t call Final Cut Pro a production-level product. If the benefit is dramatic, you can accelerate the pace. Replace a Mac station with a PC station when someone leaves. “Workers” like that could already be a drain on a business!Ī good compromise would be to let attrition take its course. If you notice, most of the reasons for choosing the Mac are related to personal entertainment, and not to producing work. People who are already behind the curve professionally, and who aren’t willing to grow will become all but useless in short order. I would argue that in the long term it would be more of a drain than a benefit. In that case, it may be more economical to keep the current staff. The exception to that is #3, where a shop may be staffed by PC-illiterate people. The bottom line is profit, and the means to this goal is by getting the best and most economical tools for the job. However if this is for profit, then cost is a major consideration. Others have budgets, or simply don’t want to waste money. Some people like to brag about how much they spend on this or that. If it’s just a hobby, then cost may or may not be an issue. If one stays within the bounds of the question, the next question that must be asked is whether this is for pleasure or commerce. That list really is more general than the question that it asks.
0 kommentar(er)
